Publications

2 June 2017

Of Garbage Cans and Paradox: Reflexively Reviewing Design, Mission Command, and the Gray Zone

by :

Author: Grant Martin

Abstract: As a rule-following organization, the military both suffers and benefits from bureaucracy. One of the negative characteristics of bureaucracy is the co-opting of innovation. This co-option results in the dismantling of ideas and the re-wickering of innovative tools into something unworkable or at cross-purposes to their original intent. To make sense of this we first must look at the concept of paradox and understand that what we observe is not irrational or abnormal: paradox is the rule in how human institutions behave. Second, there are ways with which to make sense of paradox. Next, one example is provided, applying the Garbage Can Model of Decision Making to some of the military’s examples of paradox. Lastly, I use these insights to describe how organizations co-opt new ideas. This concept could allow military professionals to understand what happens to new ideas and why they happen so that they can anticipate co-option’s negative effects.

* Note: this paper is part of the Special Issue of Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, titled ‘Reflexive Military Practitioners: Design Thinking and Beyond’. The full issue can be accessed at: http://jmss.org/jmss/index.php/jmss/issue/view/76

View special issue via JMSS

Download PDF

Martin, G. _Of Garbage Cans and Paradox_2017

You may also like

2 June 2017

Recommended Innovation Articles (and Commentary) 13: ‘The Origin and Meaning of Miles’ Law’ by Rufus Miles [JSTOR access for PDF]

Read More
2 June 2017

Rhizomes: In Paradox to ‘Centers of Gravity’ and Centralized Hierarchies in War

Read More
2 June 2017

Get Out of Afghanistan: A Challenge to Military Design Thinking Educators

Read More